To preface this, your presentation was one of my favorites because of the attention you paid to the literary elements, their inspiration, and their HOLISTIC impact upon the work as a whole. You, in my opinion had one of the best combinations of all three of these factors. The design aspects improved the entire project. I really enjoyed the artistic aspects of your blog—very reminiscent of the era of Jane Austen and the concept of wealth and privilege. I was also very amused by your tweet. It was clever, summed up the message well, and fit nicely into your theme of the poster. When I delved deeper into the content of your blog, I really enjoyed your research paper. Again, I say this because of your explicit attention to the literary elements that go about CREATING meaning. After reading it, I better understand Austen’s influences as well, as you were able to make the implications of the influences transient enough to back up the majority of what you said with sources. As a result, the paper as a whole was cohesive, although I feel as if your thesis development waned a bit. Some of the points came across as erroneous, but the overall effect of the paper was still positive.
To preface this, your presentation was one of my favorites because of the attention you paid to the literary elements, their inspiration, and their HOLISTIC impact upon the work as a whole. You, in my opinion had one of the best combinations of all three of these factors. The design aspects improved the entire project. I really enjoyed the artistic aspects of your blog—very reminiscent of the era of Jane Austen and the concept of wealth and privilege. I was also very amused by your tweet. It was clever, summed up the message well, and fit nicely into your theme of the poster.
ReplyDeleteWhen I delved deeper into the content of your blog, I really enjoyed your research paper. Again, I say this because of your explicit attention to the literary elements that go about CREATING meaning. After reading it, I better understand Austen’s influences as well, as you were able to make the implications of the influences transient enough to back up the majority of what you said with sources. As a result, the paper as a whole was cohesive, although I feel as if your thesis development waned a bit. Some of the points came across as erroneous, but the overall effect of the paper was still positive.